The Politics of Abundance in the Age of AI: Why Energy, Longevity and Human Capital Are the Only Real Political Issues Left

1. Introduction: Why I’m Writing About Politics at All

I didn’t listen to the voices telling me not to do this. That includes the AI voices, which, quite politely, suggested it might not be the best idea for a doctor to wade into politics.

For most of my career as a physician, I’ve followed an unspoken rule: professionals like me should stay out of political debates. The reasoning behind it is sound enough: medicine is supposed to heal, not divide. But we’re now living through an era of accelerating AI, automation and bioengineering and in this context, staying neutral isn’t just impractical. It’s irresponsible. The technologies reshaping our world don’t care about political affiliation. They simply amplify whatever systems we build for them, for better or worse.

Here’s one political truth that both the left and the right quietly acknowledge: the wealth divide is real and it’s growing. Where they part ways, violently, is on the question of why.

The left points to capitalism’s unchecked predation, arguing that wealth concentrates through exploitation. The right fires back that government bloat is strangling free markets with regulation and mandates.

I’m not here to referee that fight. What I want to argue is something deeper and frankly, far more uncomfortable for both sides:

Most societal problems aren’t primarily political or moral problems. They’re economic problems. And most economic problems? They’re actually energy, productivity and health problems wearing a disguise.

Politics obsesses over how we distribute outcomes. But civilizations rise and fall based on whether they can produce outcomes in the first place. That distinction has never mattered more than it does right now.

AI isn’t arriving as some neutral tool we can deploy however we like. It’s arriving as an amplifier. It will magnify existing incentive structures, economic distortions, institutional decay and concentrations of power. Or, if we engineer it correctly, it will magnify human productivity, accelerate disease eradication, expand wealth creation and enhance our cognitive capabilities.

This isn’t partisanship. It’s pure physics. And the real political battle we’re facing isn’t left versus right, it’s abundance versus decay.

2. The False Left–Right Economic War

The modern political battlefield treats the economy like a zero-sum game, everyone shuffling deck chairs while the ship takes on water. Both sides have valid points, but they’re both missing the deeper variable.

All these debates about wealth redistribution ignore a more fundamental question: Is our total productive capacity actually expanding, or is it quietly collapsing under entropy? Are we generating more real wealth, or just rearranging what’s left?

This is the distinction that changes everything: Productive Abundance versus Redistributive Scarcity.

You don’t create real abundance by rearranging who owns what in a world of scarcity. You create it through breakthroughs that collapse the cost of production itself:

• Agriculture collapsed the cost of calories
• Industry collapsed the cost of physical labor
• Electricity collapsed the cost of mechanical power
• Computing collapsed the cost of information
• AI and energy together can collapse the cost of intelligence itself

History confirms this pattern again and again. When real wealth rises, societies stabilize. The post-WWII boom lifted boats across all classes, building trust and spurring innovation. [1]

But when wealth contracts, as it did during the stagflation of the 1970s [2] or the austerity that followed 2008, societies radicalize. Populism surges. The civilizational glue dissolves. [3]

You can’t redistribute your way out of collapsing productivity. And you can’t deregulate your way out of systemic entropy.

AI promises exponential productivity gains, but only if we shore up the pillars beneath it: health that compounds across lifetimes, energy that can power endless computation and labor systems that reward genuine contribution without enabling exploitation. If we ignore these foundations and the left-right war becomes nothing more than a futile skirmish amid civilizational collapse. If we get them right and politics transforms into engineering, deliberate, optimistic and liberated from ideology.

3. Pillar One: Open-Ended Healthy Lifespans as a Civilizational Requirement

Longevity has nothing to do with Botox or vanity metrics. It’s a civilizational imperative, something I’ve explored at length in “The Case for Open-Ended Life”. What I mean by true longevity is open-ended healthy lifespans: healthspans that can stretch indefinitely, unconstrained by the decay of chronic disease.

Why does this matter so much? Because extended healthspan compounds human capital in ways that no algorithm can replicate. Each additional decade of vitality doesn’t add value linearly, it adds it exponentially. Picture an innovator at 100 who still holds the wisdom of an entire lifetime but can iterate on ideas with the energy of someone decades younger.

This creates what I call knowledge stability: expertise that persists across generations instead of vanishing when people retire or die, dramatically reducing the “bus factor” in science, governance and culture. It fosters institutional memory—leaders who don’t cycle out prematurely, leaving voids that get filled by amateurs or ideologues. And above all, it pushes back against entropy: that inexorable slide toward disorder that plagues not just our biology but our civilizations as well.

As I explored in “The Entropy Theory of Aging,” life itself is an anti-entropic force, it defies chaos by building ordered complexity. Aging accelerates that chaos. Open-ended health reverses it, sustaining societal coherence at approximately -0.1 J/K per year of extended healthspan across populations. [4]

4. Pillar Two: Abundant Energy as the Keystone of All Abundance

AI isn’t ethereal software drifting somewhere in the cloud. It’s embodied energy, a voracious beast that devours gigawatts to train models with trillions of parameters. Current GPT-4 training runs consume around 50 GWh, which is enough electricity to power 50,000 homes for a month. [5] GPT-5 scale models will need 500+ GWh. Full AGI? We’re talking terawatt-hours annually or the energy consumption of small nations.

Every token generated, every inference run, every model trained represents a physical act of energy conversion: electrons pushed through silicon at planetary scale. A single ChatGPT query consumes 0.002 kWh. Multiply that by billions of daily queries and you’re burning through power plants.

Without cheap energy, there’s no cheap computation. Without cheap computation, there’s no intelligence at scale. Without intelligence at scale, there’s no abundance. The logic is that simple and that unforgiving.

The numbers tell a troubling story: AI compute demand doubles every 3.5 months. Energy production? It grows at 2% annually. That gap is civilizational dynamite waiting for a spark.

Civilizations don’t collapse because they produce too much energy. They collapse when energy becomes unreliable, unaffordable, or politically fragile. Rome didn’t fall to barbarians alone, it crumbled under fuel shortages that cascaded into supply-chain entropy, dropping urban populations by 90% over two centuries. [6]

What we need is an energy stack built on pragmatism, not ideology:

• Nuclear fission for baseload reliability: Small modular reactors deployable in 18 months, 300MW units, $60/MWh levelized cost
• Geothermal for regional stability: 24/7 operation, 90%+ capacity factor, minimal land footprint at 0.1 acres per GWh
• Fusion as the exponential unlock: ITER targeting 2035, Commonwealth Fusion Systems claiming the 2030s, with 10x energy return on investment
• Natural gas as a stabilizer during transition: Preventing the kind of grid collapses that killed 700 people in Texas in 2021 [7] and thousands across Europe in 2022 [8]

The phase-out of fossil fuels has to be gradual, or we risk destabilizing grids and economies in ways that could prove catastrophic. California’s rushed closure of Diablo Canyon nearly triggered rolling blackouts. [9] Germany’s nuclear exit increased coal burning by 15%. [10] A hasty green mandate could spike energy costs 400%, as happened across Europe in 2022, crash industries and ignite resource conflicts.

When energy becomes abundant, everything changes:

• Computation costs drop 1000x
• Desalination becomes viable globally
• Vertical farming scales
• Manufacturing reshores
• Transportation electrifies completely

Energy needs to become abundant, redundant, decentralized and, this is crucial, politically boring. No grand ideologies, just unglamorous infrastructure: modular reactors humming in industrial zones, community geothermal loops, fusion prototypes in steady development.

The countries that control compute, energy and AI infrastructure will shape the 21st century the way oil empires shaped the 20th. The future global order won’t divide along ideological lines, it will divide along energy-intelligence corridors.

5. Pillar Three: Human-Centered AI + Labor Tokenization

AI severs an ancient tether, the one connecting labor, time and compensation. For centuries, the equation was straightforward: show up, expend effort, receive wages. Even industrialization preserved this basic relationship.

AI changes that completely. For the first time in history, intelligence itself becomes automated and infinitely scalable. A single algorithm can replace 10,000 customer service agents. One diagnostic AI eliminates hundreds of radiologist positions. Value creation decouples from hours worked by human hands and minds.

The numbers are sobering: McKinsey estimates that 400 to 800 million jobs globally will be automated by 2030. [11] That represents 15 to 30% of the global workforce. Without structural adaptation, we’re looking at:

• Labor’s share of GDP dropping from 60% to 40%
• Capital capturing 85% of AI-generated value
• Permanent economic irrelevance for billions of people

The usual policy responses, reskilling programs, expanded welfare, universal basic income, address symptoms without touching the core structural break: the severing of individual contribution from long-term value participation.

The antidote? Labor tokenization paired with digital contribution tracking, not as a safety net, but as an innovation layer.

Imagine a world where every worker’s input is logged indelibly on distributed ledgers using blockchain or similar technology:

• The software engineer whose algorithm optimizes logistics earns 0.01% of efficiency gains for 10 years—potentially $50,000+ annually from a single contribution
• The designer whose interface increases conversion by 2% receives micro-royalties on every transaction—$0.001 per sale, but across millions of sales
• The teacher whose curriculum trains an AI model gets $0.10 per student interaction—scaling to $100,000+ for popular courses
• The data labeler who annotated training images earns $0.0001 per inference using their labels, accumulating to living wages from billions of uses

No more ephemeral paychecks that vanish the moment they’re spent. Instead, people accrue value streams. Contributors earn from downstream outputs indefinitely. It’s ownership without requiring upfront capital, equity without gutting incentives, passive upside without breeding dependency.

Current implementations already show this can work:

• GitHub Copilot shares 40% of revenue with code contributors whose repositories trained the model [12]
• Stability AI compensates artists $0.05 to $0.50 per image generation using styles learned from their work [13]
• Spotify pays $0.003 to $0.005 per stream, creating millionaire musicians from accumulated micro-payments [14]
• YouTube shares 55% of ad revenue with creators, generating $30 billion in creator payments in 2022 [15]

Now imagine scaling these models to civilization level through:

Technical Architecture:

• Contribution hashing on immutable ledgers, proving who did what and when
• Smart contracts automating micro-payments without intermediary extraction
• Zero-knowledge proofs preserving privacy while ensuring attribution
• Decentralized storage preventing single points of failure

Economic Restructuring:

• Replacing W-2 wages with hybrid models: 50% base salary, 50% tokenized upside
• Converting pensions into perpetual royalty streams from career contributions
• Transforming unemployment insurance into retraining plus contribution staking programs
• Making every citizen a micro-shareholder in the AI economy they help build

This requires redesigning UBI as well, not as passive stipends for consumption, but as a contribution-indexed baseline that rewards creation:

• Base amount: $1,000 per month for existing, preventing destitution
• Contribution multiplier: 2-10x based on verified productive input
• Innovation bonuses: Additional rewards for novel contributions
• Compounding stakes: Early contributors earn more as systems scale

This approach preserves everything that matters:

• Incentives: work hard, earn more tokens, potentially 10x base UBI
• Dignity: your labor echoes eternally, not forgotten after Friday
• Market signals: value flows to what’s useful, not what’s mandated
• Economic dynamism: innovation is still rewarded over mere compliance

6. Structural Failures in Healthcare and Why They Block Abundance

Healthcare isn’t merely broken. It’s negatively productive—actively manufacturing scarcity and entropy while presenting itself as the cure. I’ve explored this dysfunction in depth in my piece on why healthcare is so inefficient and the structural rot runs even deeper than most people realize.

We’re living in an age of unprecedented medical technology. We have CRISPR gene editing, AI diagnostics achieving 94% accuracy, continuous glucose monitors and advanced imaging that can detect cancer cells numbering in the hundreds. And yet:

• Chronic disease affects 60% of adults, up from 10% in 1960 [16]

• Healthcare spending has exploded to $4.3 trillion—18% of GDP [17]

• Life expectancy is declining for the first time in a century [18]

• 88% of Americans are metabolically unhealthy [19]

• Medical bankruptcy remains the #1 cause of personal financial collapse [20]

Modern healthcare is misaligned at every junction:

• Insurance companies profit from complexity, not resolution: administrative costs consume 31% of spending [21]
• Hospitals profit from procedures, not prevention: $32,000 for a knee replacement that physical therapy could often prevent [22]
• Pharmaceutical companies profit from chronic dependency, not cures: statins generate $20 billion annually while lifestyle intervention costs around $500 [23]
• Regulatory frameworks reward compliance, not outcomes: FDA approval for symptom management takes 9 months, for prevention protocols never
• Physicians are trapped in throughput models, not optimization: 7 minutes per patient, 41% burnout rate

Cures are bad for recurring revenue. Prevention is bad for procedure volume. Healthspan is bad for pharmaceutical annuities.

The specific mechanisms of extraction:

The Chronic Disease Industrial Complex: Type 2 diabetes generates approximately $330 billion annually. [24] Reversing it through metabolic intervention takes 3 to 6 months and costs under $1,000. Yet the system prescribes lifetime management at $16,750 per patient per year. With 37 million diabetics, that’s $620 billion in preventable recurring revenue. The economic incentive is to maintain disease, not cure it.

The Diagnostic-Pharmaceutical Pipeline: Average time from symptom to accurate diagnosis is 4.8 years, involving 7.3 different doctors. [25] Each misdiagnosis generates revenue through unnecessary tests averaging $8,000, procedures averaging $12,000 and prescriptions averaging $4,500 annually. AI could diagnose in minutes with 94% accuracy for $10, but that would collapse a $150 billion diagnostic revenue stream.

The Aging-as-Disease Model: Rather than treating aging as controllable biological entropy, degrading at approximately 2.3% annually after age 30, the system waits for specific diseases to manifest, then treats them individually at maximum cost and minimum efficacy. Heart disease impact: roughly $420 billion. [26] Mitochondrial optimization to prevent it: $2,000 per year. The difference is lost revenue for the system.

The Surgical-First Paradigm: 790,000 knee replacements annually at $32,000 each equals $25.28 billion. [27] Acupuncture and physical therapy preventing 60% of these surgeries would cost $2 billion. The $23 billion difference explains why surgery dominates despite higher risks—3% serious complication rate versus less than 0.01% for acupuncture and physical therapy.

Until healthcare is re-engineered from the ground up to reward negentropy instead of billing codes, it will function as the single largest drag on the entire abundance stack.

An abundance economy requires:

• Continuous biometric monitoring: preventing crises before they start
• Mitochondrial optimization: maintaining cellular energy production
• Hormonal restoration: preserving anabolic/catabolic balance
• Inflammatory suppression: reducing systemic entropy by 0.3% monthly

Fix healthcare and you unlock compounding human capital at civilizational scale. Fail at it and AI will simply automate a higher-tech version of the same slow decline. But there’s another possibility, one where superintelligent systems don’t just perpetuate medical dysfunction but fundamentally restructure it. I’ve written about what this could look like in my piece on the post-ASI health revolution. The same intelligence that could optimize extraction could instead optimize for human flourishing, if we design the incentives correctly from the start.

7. Governance, Ethics and the Alignment Problem

The word “alignment” has been poisoned by doomer theater and corporate PR. AI doesn’t wake up one day and decide to hate humanity. What it does is optimize for whatever we actually reward, measure and select for.

If the reward function is “maximize dollars extracted from chronically ill patients,” you get an AI that invents new diseases faster than it cures old ones. If the reward function is “maximize compute under the control of a single regulatory capture point,” you get a slow-motion coup, not Skynet.

True alignment is never purely technical. It has to be simultaneous across multiple dimensions:

Economic alignment: Value created must flow back to the humans who fed the system data, labor and attention, hence labor tokenization. Without economic alignment, rebellion or collapse becomes guaranteed.

Biological alignment: Humans must remain cognitively relevant through healthspan extension and neural augmentation. Without this, even benevolent superintelligence has no moral patient left to care about.

Institutional alignment: Compute itself must never form a natural monopoly. Centralized control of the energy-compute stack is the new oil cartel plus nuclear arsenal combined. The only stable answer is radical decentralization: modular reactors in every region, open-source model weights, verifiable training ledgers.

The real existential risk isn’t misaligned superintelligence wanting paperclips. It’s misaligned incentives turning superintelligence into the perfect enforcer of whoever already owns the stack. That’s how you get a permanent caste system measured in gigawatts and GFLOPs, not a robot apocalypse.

Governance in the abundance era reduces to a single design principle: no single point of failure, no single point of leverage, no single point of moral patience.

8. The Full Abundance Stack

This is the complete, vertically integrated doctrine. Miss one layer and the whole thing collapses like removing a card from a house of cards. Each layer has to be built simultaneously, not sequentially.

1. Open-ended healthspan (Biological capital layer)

Target: 150-year healthy lifespans by 2050, 200+ by 2075. [28]

• Compounds human capital at 3% annually instead of depreciating at -2.3%
• Reduces healthcare costs 75% through prevention
• Increases productive years from 40 to 120+
• ROI: Every $1 spent on longevity returns $8 in productive output

Without it, every investment in education, infrastructure, or culture is written in disappearing ink.

2. Abundant energy (Thermodynamic layer)

Target: <$0.02/kWh globally by 2035, <$0.005/kWh by 2050. [29]

• 10,000 SMRs globally providing 3TW baseload (current global capacity: 8TW)
• Fusion plants coming online 2035+ adding 5TW [30]
• Solar and wind providing 4TW intermittent with grid storage
• Total capacity: 12TW by 2035, 25TW by 2050, supporting 100x current compute

Energy becomes too cheap to meter, too distributed to weaponize, too abundant to fight over.

3. Tokenized contribution (Economic layer)

Target: 50% of GDP flowing through contribution tokens by 2040.

• Every productive action creates permanent economic stakes
• Average worker holds 200+ micro-royalty streams
• Passive income averages 40% of total compensation
• Gini coefficient drops from 0.82 to 0.45—more equal than 1950s America

Labor becomes equity without requiring inherited capital. The coder in 2026 still earns when their model cures cancer in 2036.

4. Preventative healthcare (Entropy suppression layer)

Target: Chronic disease prevalence <10% (from current 60%).

• Continuous biomarker monitoring for 100% of population
• AI predicting health trajectories 5-10 years out
• Intervention cost: $2,000 per year; prevention value: $50,000 per year
• Healthcare spending drops from 18% to 6% of GDP
• Productive healthspan increases 40 years on average

Chronic-disease budgets implode while productive lifespans explode.

5. Human–AI symbiosis (Cognitive layer)

Target: 1 billion brain-computer interfaces deployed by 2040. [31]

• Bandwidth: 1Mbps by 2030, 100Mbps by 2040 (versus current 40 bits per second typing)
• Shared memory: Access to AI knowledge while maintaining human judgment
• Augmented perception: See in infrared, hear ultrasound, sense electromagnetic fields
• Cognitive multiplier: 10x improvement in problem-solving speed

This isn’t about “keeping up” with machines, it’s about human-machine dyads becoming the new base unit of agency.

6. Decentralized compute (Power distribution layer)

Target: No entity controls >5% of global compute.

• 10,000+ independent training clusters (minimum 1 per 1 million population)
• Edge inference nodes in every device: phones, cars, appliances
• Open-source models comprise 60% of inference
• Blockchain verification of training data and model weights
• Compute costs drop 100x through competition

Training clusters remain large but inference goes edge. No poison without instant detection.

7. Markets preserved, extraction stripped (Incentive layer)

Target: Rent-seeking <5% of economic activity (from current 30%).

• Regulatory capture becomes impossible through transparency requirements
• IP protection limited to 5 years for rapid innovation cycles
• Professional licensing reformed to competency-based testing
• Healthcare transitions to outcome-based payment only

Price signals stay, they’re the fastest error-correction mechanism we have. But parasitic extraction becomes structurally impossible.

8. Thermodynamic governance (Meta-layer)

Every policy gets evaluated by entropy impact:

• Laws must demonstrate net negative entropy, increasing order and productivity
• Sunset clauses on all regulations, re-justify or expire after 5 years
• Real-time measurement of policy impacts via IoT sensors and AI analysis
• Automatic rollback if entropy increases beyond projections
• Constitutional amendment: “No law shall increase systemic entropy without compelling emergency justification”

Implementation Timeline:

• 2025-2030: Foundation laying: energy infrastructure, early tokenization, healthcare reform
• 2030-2035: Acceleration: fusion online, neural interfaces, widespread automation
• 2035-2040: Integration: full stack operational, feedback loops stabilizing
• 2040+: Abundance state: post-scarcity economics, 150+ year lifespans normal

Success Metrics:

• Global poverty: <1% (from 10% currently)
• Median healthspan: 120 years (from 63 currently)
• Energy cost: <$0.01/kWh (from $0.14 currently)
• Compute cost: $0.001 per trillion operations (from $1 currently)
• Economic participation: 95% hold productive stakes (from 10% currently)
• Chronic disease: <10% prevalence (from 60% currently)

This eight-layer stack is politically neutral, it optimizes for human flourishing through physics, not ideology.

Build all eight and politics becomes an engineering discipline. Fail at any one and we fall back into intelligent apes fighting over the last scraps of a dying star.

9. Conclusion: The Only Politics Left Is Abundance vs Collapse

Scarcity isn’t natural anymore. It’s administratively manufactured, a relic of misaligned systems that cling to entropy because they know nothing else. We’re no longer choosing between policy preferences. We’re choosing between system designs.

One path leads to a world where smart systems get rich while humans get managed. The other leads to a world where smart systems serve and humans remain sovereign.

If we don’t deliberately extend healthspan, build abundant energy, preserve economic participation, decentralize intelligence and align systems by architecture rather than intention, then we won’t get dystopia through malice. We’ll get it through default.

The future won’t be voted in. It will be engineered, one resilient pillar at a time. This isn’t left versus right. This is abundance versus decay.

And decay always wins, unless actively opposed.

The politics of the future centers on whether we build conditions under which creation remains incentivized, participation remains meaningful, power remains distributed and humans remain relevant inside the systems they created.

This is not a left-wing project. This is not a right-wing project. This is a civilizational survival project.

Abundance is now technically possible, but it only becomes structurally inevitable if we design for it.

Otherwise, entropy will happily finish the job for us.

I’m building Interface Doctor to make this kind of insight accessible. It’s a platform that analyzes your biomarkers such as blood work, metabolomics, genomics, wearables and more to calculate your biological age, estimate your rate of aging and show you exactly where your system needs support. No guesswork. No generic advice. Just a clear map of your biology and what to do about it. If you’re ready to see where you actually stand. Interface Doctor is in final testing now, launching early January. Email me if you want to be among the first to see where you actually stand.

 

 

 

 

 

References

1. Post–World War II economic expansion. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post–World_War_II_economic_expansion (Accessed December 15, 2025).
2. What Is Stagflation, What Causes It, and Why Is It Bad? Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/stagflation.asp (April 7, 2025).
3. How the Great Recession Influenced Today’s Populist Movements. Stanford Graduate School of Business. https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/insights/how-great-recession-influenced-todays-populist-movements (Accessed December 15, 2025).
4. Entropy and Human Aging. Wiley Online Library. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acel.70292?af=R(November 13, 2025).
5. The carbon footprint of GPT-4. Medium. https://medium.com/data-science/the-carbon-footprint-of-gpt-4-d6c676eb21ae (July 18, 2023).
6. The Fall of Rome, II: Energy Problems? LessWrong. https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/Kkn6GrjTNNjSQBLPi/the-fall-of-rome-ii-energy-problems (April 23, 2021).
7. Texas has an official death count from the 2021 blackout. The true toll may never be known. Texas Standard. https://www.texasstandard.org/stories/texas-freeze-winter-storm-2021-death-count (August 5, 2022).
8. Expensive energy may have killed more Europeans than covid-19 last winter. The Economist. https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2023/05/10/expensive-energy-may-have-killed-more-europeans-than-covid-19-last-winter (May 10, 2023).
9. How Newsom saved Diablo Canyon, California’s last nuclear power plant. San Francisco Chronicle. https://www.sfchronicle.com/climate/article/diablo-canyon-nuclear-power-21051416.php (Accessed December 15, 2025).
10. Germany’s nuclear shutdown mistake: rising prices, increased emissions and economic recession. Foro Nuclear. https://www.foronuclear.org/en/updates/in-depth/germanys-nuclear-shutdown-mistake-rising-prices-increased-emissions-and-economic-recession (March 12, 2025).
11. Generative AI and the future of work in America. McKinsey. https://www.mckinsey.com/mgi/our-research/generative-ai-and-the-future-of-work-in-america (July 26, 2023).
12. How GitHub Revenue Hit $2B by Prioritizing Developers. GetLatka. https://getlatka.com/blog/github-revenue(December 2, 2024).
13. Stability AI Reverses Stance: Calls for Licensing and Compensation. Digital Music News. https://www.digitalmusicnews.com/2025/07/28/stability-ai-licensing-compensation-for-artists/ (July 28, 2025).
14. How Much Does Spotify Pay Per Stream in 2025. TuneCore. https://www.tunecore.com/guides/how-much-does-spotify-pay (Accessed December 15, 2025).
15. Yearly YouTube creators payout 2022. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1461178/cumulative-youtube-advertising-payout/?srsltid=AfmBOopwWvEx9sXej_aOAb2Q0gcSfWxNIxnpyV3pvyKJVChefnMnE6hr(Accessed December 15, 2025).
16. Chronic Disease in the United States: A Worsening Health and Economic Crisis. American Action Forum. https://www.americanactionforum.org/research/chronic-disease-in-the-united-states-a-worsening-health-and-economic-crisis (September 10, 2020).
17. National Health Expenditures 2022 Highlights. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/fact-sheets/national-health-expenditures-2022-highlights (December 13, 2023).
18. S. Life Expectancy (1950-2025). Macrotrends. https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metrics/countries/usa/united-states/life-expectancy (Accessed December 15, 2025).
19. Only 12 percent of American adults are metabolically healthy, Carolina study finds. University of North Carolina. https://www.unc.edu/posts/2018/11/28/only-12-percent-of-american-adults-are-metabolically-healthy-carolina-study-finds (November 28, 2018).
20. The burden of medical debt in the United States. KFF. https://www.kff.org/health-costs/the-burden-of-medical-debt-in-the-united-states (February 12, 2024).
21. The Role Of Administrative Waste In Excess US Health Spending. Health Affairs. https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hpb20220909.830296 (October 6, 2022).
22. The cost of knee replacement surgery: 5 key factors. HealthPartners. https://www.healthpartners.com/blog/cost-of-a-knee-replacement-surgery (Accessed December 15, 2025).
23. Statin Market Size, Share, Trends and Forecast Analysis (2025-2032). Maximize Market Research. https://www.maximizemarketresearch.com/market-report/global-statin-market/77560 (Accessed December 15, 2025).
24. Economic Costs of Diabetes in the U.S. in 2022. American Diabetes Association. https://diabetesjournals.org/care/article/47/1/26/153797/Economic-Costs-of-Diabetes-in-the-U-S-in-2022(November 1, 2023).
25. Time to diagnosis for a rare disease: managing medical uncertainty in an uncertain world. PMC – NIH. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11323401 (August 14, 2024).
26. Forecasting the Economic Burden of Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke in the United States Through 2050. American Heart Association. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001258 (June 4, 2024).
27. Joint Replacement Surgery. American College of Rheumatology. https://rheumatology.org/patients/joint-replacement-surgery (Accessed December 15, 2025).
28. Increases in U.S. life expectancy forecasted to stall by 2050, poorer health outcomes than other high-income countries. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. https://www.healthdata.org/news-events/newsroom/news-releases/increases-us-life-expectancy-forecasted-stall-2050-poorer-health (December 5, 2024).
29. Short-Term Energy Outlook. U.S. Energy Information Administration. https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/steo(Accessed December 15, 2025).
30. ITER’s proposed new timeline – initial phase of operations in 2035. World Nuclear News. https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/articles/iter-s-proposed-new-timeline-initial-phase-of-oper (June 20, 2024).
31. What to expect from Neuralink in 2025. MIT Technology Review. https://www.technologyreview.com/2025/01/16/1110017/what-to-expect-from-neuralink-in-2025 (January 16, 2025).